Toddlers to televisions
Posted on Monday, October 15, 2007 ( Pedology | Cora | Technology )

A while back I wrote about how we wound up with a brand new John Deere riding mower. That was an example of how certain big purchase decisions work out between Crystal and I wherein she expresses her disapproval and I proceed regardless. However, there is another (less contentious) sequence of interactions that also occasionally leads us to major purchases - and I'm going to reveal it now.

Our daughter, Cora, is getting older. I know we all are, but at eight months old her changes with age areKid chewing cord considerably more pronounced than ours. For instance, she now has three bottom teeth (central incisors P and O and lateral incisor N) and just pushed out two top teeth (central incisors E and F) in the last week. She's also sitting up on her own, standing up while supporting herself (tables, etc), and most importantly for this discussion, getting very close to crawling. It's not unheard of for babies to crawl as early as six months, but on average it comes around nine or ten months. Armed with this knowledge, we knew it was time to start baby-proofing the house.

It's actually not that difficult to make a typical house safe for a toddler. Sure, they grab, pull and chew on anything they can reach, but they are extremely short people with very little jumping ability (like an Ewok, but with less fur and better English.) The difficult areas tend to be ones we often overlook, such as the living room entertainment center / TV stand. There's pretty solid empirical evidence that most people forget about the TV issue. To demonstrate, take a walk through your local electronics store's home theater area. Pay attention and you'll notice that the vast majority of current TV stands are completely open: front, back, and sides.

Our entertainment center wasn't bad, except that because the side shelves (behind glass) were too narrow to hold all of our components, we had to keep the larger ones on the bottom. The doors on the bottom were solid wood, which infrared (IR) remote controls do not appreciate. To address that, I had to remove the doors exposing the receiver and DVD player at floor level - just begging to be messed with by a tiny person.

Would it be that horrible if Cora messed up the sound on our TV? Probably not. But it would definitely be annoying and occasionally frustrating enough that we would get mad at her. Plus there existed the slight possibility that she could pull something out or onto her and cause injury. Why risk it?

The moment I realized Crystal and I both wanted a new entertainment center, my mind went into overdrive. Logically, we would have to choose one appropriately sized for our television. However, we also knew that our TV had been toying with death for months and was apparently operating on borrowed time. That meant we'd have to buy an entertainment center that not only fit well with our current TV, but would also work well with our next TV - a nearly impossible feat given recent changes in the home entertainment landscape. Once I consciously made this connection, I knew I had my silver bullet. It was the knight-in-shining-argument [sic] that would enable me to convince Crystal that, indeed, we would have to choose a new TV before we could choose a stand.

So we started shopping for both entertainment centers and TV's, and for several months made very little progress. Everything we liked was outside our fiscal comfort level and as I mentioned earlier, a good majority of the entertainment centers did not meet our standards for child resistance. I also really wanted to support our local A/V dealer, which limited us a bit (but not too badly as Dennis has a great store and their new showroom is outstanding.)

Then one day Crystal noticed an ad from Best Buy for interest-free financing for two years on anything we purchased if it included a TV for $999 or above. We decided to visit the closest store and when we did, we noticed this stand which is beautiful and met all of our requirements. Except one, of course ... price. After some wavering and a full day's research to select the right TV, we eventually went back to the store to make our purchase. A lot of money was spent committed that evening - I'm sure far more than either of us ever imagined spending on home entertainment. But we also got some great deals and exactly what we wanted.

The maxim I'm trying to convey is that had we not been shopping for entertainment centers to keep Cora's cute little hands in check, there is no way I could have successfully argued for a high-end television to replace our existing bottom-end model. Of course, that doesn't mean we wouldn't have wound up with one - but this route was a great deal more pleasant for everyone involved.

Dress coder
Posted on Saturday, October 13, 2007 ( Ergology | Sociology )

Our CTO commented today that, "there are no ties in technology." I think he was quoting somebody, but I'm not certain. Anyway, his statement was in reference to a QA Engineer candidate who showed up for his interview wearing (what I consider) business semi-formal attire. In other words, he wasn't wearing a suit, but he was wearing a collared shirt with a tie. The tie didn't bother me a bit - but it did stand out. It also got me thinking about how my career has steadily increased my professional responsibility while inversely affecting my attire.

As listed in my LinkedIn profile, I've had four professional software development jobs in my career. At Louisiana-Pacific (LP), I was just out of school and a very junior programmer. Our dress code was dress slacks and collared shirt. Some people wore ties, but most did not. Following that I went to work on the other side of town for Integra Telecom as a mid-level programmer. Their dress code was still very professional, but since IT had our own floor, we got away with a more relaxed appearance. I generally wore khaki pants and polo shirts, but on Fridays we'd go collar-less and sometimes blue jeans.

A few months after we moved to Newberg, I found a job with DAC working out of the bottom floor of a large house on a private vineyard. My responsibility increased a bit more as I was basically given sole responsibility for one of the major subsystems - but still carefully supervised by our chief architect. There were only five of us, and there were no clients and no big bosses, which meant we wore whatever we wanted. Typically I dressed up more than the rest, wearing jeans and polo shirts or nice tee-shirts. But in the warm months, I wore shorts.

Flash forward to today and I'm sitting at work wearing nothing ... just kidding. I'm still wearing jeans and polo shirts, but the dress code is no more formal than it was at DAC. Some of us wear tee-shirts, some wear slacks and polos, and some wear shorts. No one, however, wears a tie. My responsibility has grown even more as I'm now expected to operate with little to no oversight and will likely be directing others as our team grows. It's a challenge I'm really enjoying and I look forward to doing it - in my own style.

Oh, and in case you're wondering; no, the candidate didn't get the job. But it had nothing to do with his appearance...

All content © 2010, Shawn Hempel